Characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock during COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created challenges in delivering acute cardiovascular care. Quality measures and outcomes of patients presenting with AMICS during COVID-19 in the United States have not been well described. METHODS: We identified 406 patients from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative (NCSI) with AMICS and divided them into those presenting before (N = 346, 5/9/2016-2/29/2020) and those presenting during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 60, 3/1/2020-11/10/2020). We compared baseline clinical data, admission characteristics, and outcomes. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 64 years, and 23.7% of the group was female. There were no significant differences in age, sex, and medical comorbidities between the two groups. Patients presenting during the pandemic were less likely to be Black compared to those presenting prior. Median door to balloon (90 vs. 88 min, p = 0.38), door to support (88 vs. 78 min, p = 0.13), and the onset of shock to support (74 vs. 62 min, p = 0.15) times were not significantly different between the two groups. Patients presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction more often during the COVID-19 period (95.0% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.005). In adjusted logistic regression models, COVID-19 period did not significantly associate with survival to discharge (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-2.19, p = 0.81) or with 1-month survival (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.42-1.61, p = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Care of patients presenting with AMICS has remained robust among hospitals participating in the NCSI during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Evaluating factors of greater patient satisfaction with outpatient cardiology telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The impact of telehealth on cardiovascular care during the COVID-19 pandemic on patient satisfaction and factors associated with satisfaction are not well characterized. METHODS: We conducted a nonrandomized, prospective cross-sectional survey study for outpatient telehealth cardiovascular visits over a 169-day period utilizing a validated telehealth usability questionnaire. For each variable, patients were divided into 2 groups-1 with scores above the median, labeled "greater satisfaction," and the other with scores below the median, labeled "less satisfaction." RESULTS: A total of 13,913 outpatient telehealth encounters were successfully completed during the study period. A total of 7327 unique patients were identified and received a survey invitation; 5993 (81.8%) patients opened the invitation, and 1034 (14.1%) patients consented and completed the survey. Overall mean and median scores were 3.15 (standard deviation 0.74) and 3.37 (interquartile range 2.73-3.68) (maximum score 4.00). Greater satisfaction was noted among younger patients (mean age 63.3 ± 14.0 years, P = .005), female gender (46.3%, P = .007), non-White ethnicity (24.2% P = .006), self-identified early adopters and innovators of new technology (49.8%, P < .001), 1-way travel time greater than 1 hour (22.3%, P < .001), 1-way travel distance greater than 10 miles (49.0%, P < .001), patients needing child care arrangement (16.4%, P < .001), and history of orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) (5.1%, P = .04). CONCLUSION: Patients reported overall satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Factors associated with patient convenience, along with female gender, younger age, and non-White ethnicity, correlated with greater satisfaction. Cardiovascular comorbidities did not correlate with greater satisfaction except for OHT. Further research into the impact of telehealth on patient satisfaction, safety, and clinical outcomes is needed.